Learner audits a paragraph for who is doing things, and restores agency where the argument depends on it.
Preview · progress not saved — Chapter 1 is free
Six paragraphs. Two have nobody in them and are fine.
The plan was reviewed. Concerns were raised. The proposal was withdrawn. How many people appear?
How agency disappears, when that is fine, and when it is not.
Agentless passives remove doers. So do nominalisations.
The plan was reviewed. Concerns were raised.
Rapid growth has strained services.
Use several together and the paragraph has no actors left at all.
Ten paragraphs. Four need nobody.
Sort each item into the correct category
Six paragraphs. Exactly one actor each — you choose which.
Argument: the board mishandled the review. The plan was reviewed in March. Concerns were raised. The proposal was withdrawn. → Rewrite one sentence:
Argument: the department, not the schools, made the cut. A reduction in provision followed. Services were closed across four boroughs. → Rewrite one sentence:
Argument: ministers ignored the advice they were given. The advice was disregarded. The warnings were not acted on. → Rewrite one sentence:
Argument: several large firms broke the rules with impunity. The rules were broken repeatedly. The fines were never collected. → Rewrite one sentence:
Argument: the council cut short the consultation. The consultation was shortened. The objections were set aside. → Rewrite one sentence:
Argument: the university raised fees knowing the effect. Fees were raised in 2012. The effect on poorer applicants had been forecast. → Rewrite one sentence:
Argue about a policy, and let somebody do something.
Prompt: a government has cut funding for public libraries.
Write five sentences arguing about it.
At least two sentences must have a human or institutional subject — somebody doing something.
One paragraph.
Your paragraph says something went wrong. Who did it?