Learner stops writing will directly after if in a condition, and can produce the correct half instantly.
Preview · progress not saved — Chapter 1 is free
Seven parts and exactly one will.
Build one conditional. There is exactly one *will* in the parts, and it has only one legal home.
Six sentences. Two of them keep the will and are correct.
Is this correct? If it will rain, we will cancel.
The rule, why the mistake is stubborn, and the two real exceptions.
The if-half uses the present, even when the meaning is future.
If it rains tomorrow, we will cancel.
Tomorrow is right there in the sentence. The verb is still present.
Ten sentences. Two of them are already correct.
If it will rain, we will cancel. → , we will cancel.
If prices will rise, demand will fall. → , demand will fall.
If the government will act, the crisis will end. → , the crisis will end.
I will call you if I will arrive early. → I will call you .
If he won't come, we will start. → , we will start.
If they will not agree, the plan fails. → , the plan fails.
If the train will be late, I will take a taxi. → , I will take a taxi.
If funding will stop, the project will close. → , the project will close.
If you will follow me, I will show you the room. → , I will show you the room.
If she will not listen, there is nothing I can do. → , there is nothing I can do.
Three real conditions, all about the future.
Topic: charging drivers to enter city centres.
Write three conditions. Every one of them should be about the future.
That is the trap: future meaning, present verb after if.
One per line.
Say why that is not a contradiction.
Eight if-halves. Two of them keep the will.