Learner connects the two halves of a two-part answer so the second follows from the first rather than starting again.
Preview · progress not saved — Chapter 1 is free
Six two-part answers. Two are actually joined.
Cause: commuting costs push people out of the city. Solution: the council should build more cycle lanes. Does the second follow?
Where it breaks, the one-clause join, and solving the cause you gave.
You answer part one. Then you start part two as a fresh essay.
Both halves are good. The response has no progression.
This is invisible to most checks, because nothing in either half is wrong.
Ten two-part answers. Four are joined.
Sort each item into the correct category
Six answers. Rewrite the opening of part two. Two need nothing.
Part one ends: …so commuting costs push people out of the city. Part two opens: The council should build more cycle lanes. →
Part one ends: …so the primary schools have closed. Part two opens: Reversing those closures starts with capping short-term lets. →
Part one ends: …so historic centres are emptying of residents. Part two opens: Tourism generates substantial revenue for these cities. →
Part one ends: …so parents on shifts cannot collect children at three. Part two opens: Schools should teach more practical subjects. →
Part one ends: …so junior staff lose the training they once absorbed by proximity. Part two opens: Those juniors reach management having never watched anyone do the job. →
Part one ends: …so fares have risen faster than pay for a decade. Part two opens: Subsidised season tickets would help the lowest earners. →
A solution that addresses the cause by name.
Prompt: what causes young people to leave small towns, and how could it be addressed?
Paragraph 1: one cause, three or four sentences. Paragraph 2: a solution to that cause, naming it.
The test: your solution should not work for a different cause.
Label each.
Is that cause named in your solution paragraph?