Learner chooses the idea they can develop over the idea they find most interesting, and stops spending the essay on an argument they cannot finish.
Preview · progress not saved — Chapter 1 is free
Six pairs. Three times the original idea wins.
Topic: remote work. A: it reduces commuting. B: it redistributes economic activity away from city centres in ways that reshape local tax bases. Which would you write?
Read the criterion, apply the test, and what this is not.
presents, extends and supports main ideas
Nothing about interesting. Nothing about unusual. Nothing about sophisticated.
An ordinary idea developed fully outscores an original one left hanging.
Two bridges across one gap.

One of these gets you across.
Ten claims. Sophistication does not predict the bucket.
Sort each item into the correct category
Eight claims. Five get a mechanism, three get replaced.
Remote work costs juniors the training they absorbed by proximity. → Mechanism:
Remote work reshapes local tax bases. →
Tourism hollows out residential centres. → Mechanism:
Free transport alters the marginal utility calculation underlying modal choice. →
Uniforms remove one daily argument from households with teenagers. → Mechanism:
Education reproduces social hierarchies through institutional selection. →
Fares block the lowest-paid from jobs across the city. → Mechanism:
School hours do not fit the working day of shift workers. → Mechanism:
Your most interesting claim, the one you would use, then develop the second.
Topic: whether governments should fund the arts.
Box 1: the most interesting claim you can think of on this topic. Box 2: the claim you would actually use in an exam. Box 3: develop the one in box 2 — claim, mechanism, example.
These may be the same claim. If they are, say so and develop it.
Whatever you actually find interesting.
May be the same one.
One paragraph.
You had a better idea. What would have made it work?