98032053...
30843151...
d170f7fe...
b1ec272a...
3b9dee53...
aaf5ab4f...
Learner writes a conclusion that restates the position and adds one thing — a condition, an implication, or a recommendation — without introducing a new argument.
Preview · progress not saved — Chapter 1 is free
Six conclusions. Two add nothing and one adds too much.
The benefits outweigh the cost, provided the subsidy comes from the road budget rather than from fares. What does this add?
Three things you may add, why one is enough, and the one prohibition.
condition ...provided the subsidy comes from
the road budget
implication ...which suggests cities planning
roads should reconsider
recommendation ...and cities should trial it first
Each one takes a clause, not a paragraph.
Twelve conclusions across three buckets.
Sort each item into the correct category
Eight bare restatements. Two are complete already.
Add a condition. The benefits of free transport outweigh its cost, .
Add a recommendation. Remote work has harmed junior staff, .
Add an implication. Tourism damages the historic cities it visits, .
Add a condition. A longer school day is justified, .
Governments should fund the arts, which implies that culture budgets belong outside annual spending reviews. →
Add a recommendation. Advertising aimed at young children should be banned, .
Add an implication. Companies should pay for the training their own work requires, .
A short essay on a split position. Free transport is worth funding in dense cities and not in dispersed ones. →
Two sentences: restate, then add exactly one thing.
The essay argued: companies should pay for the training their own work requires, though not for general qualifications.
Write two sentences closing it.
Restate the position, then add one of: a condition it depends on, an implication that follows, or a recommendation. Not all three.
Restate, then add one thing.
If you are right, what should somebody do?