Prove irrationality of expressions like a + b√c by isolating the root and showing a contradiction involving rational closures.
Recap Class IX rules on sum and product.
In Class IX, you explored how rational and irrational numbers interact. A quick recap:
Now, instead of just stating these rules, we are going to prove them for particular cases.
A comparison showing the difference between pure root proofs (divisibility) and composite proofs (isolation).

Notice how composite expressions do not require squaring both sides. Instead, we isolate the root to reveal a contradiction.
Explain that composite proofs don't use divisibility; they isolate the root.
For expressions like , do not use the same method as pure roots like .
If we assume is rational, write:
Now move the integer part to the other side:
The right side, , is rational because integers and fractions stay rational under subtraction.
So this would mean is rational, which is impossible.
Key idea: isolate the square root first, then show it would become rational.
Example 6: 5 - sqrt(3).
Problem. Show that is irrational.
Example 7: 3 sqrt(2).
Problem. Show that is irrational.
Order the steps for proving 3 + 2sqrt(5) is irrational.
Arrange the logical steps to prove that $3 + 2\sqrt{5}$ is irrational.
Exercise 1.2 Q3(i) 1/sqrt(2).
Let us prove that is irrational. First, assume to the contrary that is rational.
This means we can find coprime integers and (where ) such that . By rearranging this equation and inverting both sides, we isolate the square root to get .
Since and are integers, the fraction is , which would imply that is also rational. However, this the established fact that is irrational.
Therefore, our initial assumption is incorrect, proving that is indeed irrational.