The Yardstick of Democracy
Visual representation of the 5 conditions.
Click to zoom
The five minimum conditions that ensure an election is truly democratic, acting as a yardstick to evaluate electoral systems.
Distinguish democratic elections from mere voting events using five core conditions.
Preview · progress not saved — Chapter 1 is free
Introduction to the idea that non-democratic countries also hold elections.
Just because a country holds an election doesn't automatically mean it's a democracy. In fact, many non-democratic rulers and dictators hold elections just to look legitimate to the rest of the world.
If merely casting a ballot isn't enough, what exactly is the yardstick that makes an election truly democratic? Let's break down the minimum conditions required.
The five essential conditions for a democratic election.
Many countries hold elections, but not all of them are democratic. To be considered truly democratic, an election must meet these core conditions:
Visual representation of the 5 conditions.
The five minimum conditions that ensure an election is truly democratic, acting as a yardstick to evaluate electoral systems.
Fill-in-the-blanks on the 5 conditions.
For an election to be democratic, everyone should have one vote and every vote must have equal . Second, parties and candidates should be free to contest and voters must be offered a real . Third, this opportunity should be offered at regular , meaning elections must be held after every few years. Fourth, the candidate by the people should be the one who gets elected. Fifth, the entire process must be conducted in a free and manner where people can vote as they really wish. When these conditions are met, regular electoral competition provides to political parties and leaders to serve the people, similar to how a shopkeeper is forced to give good service to keep their customers.
Pros and cons of electoral competition.
Elections are essentially about political competition. While it gives voters a choice, it also has noticeable downsides.
Here are the main demerits of electoral competition:
MCQ testing the understanding of political incentives.
A political analyst uses the 'shopkeeper' analogy to explain electoral competition to a group of citizens. Based on this analogy, what is the primary point being made about political competition?