Imagine you and your friend, both working in the same sales team, are competing for a performance bonus at the end of the quarter. Your regional manager has pitched an interesting scenario: if both of you work as a team, you'll each secure a moderate bonus. However, if one person pulls ahead and outperforms, they will receive a substantial bonus while the other receives nothing. If both try to outperform each other, both risk losing the bonus. What do you do? This situation introduces you to the concept of the Prisoner's Dilemma.
The Prisoner's Dilemma, a concept from game theory, demonstrates the conflict between individual and group rationales. It is named after a hypothetical situation where two arrested criminals are held in separate cells. Each faces a choice to confess or remain silent. The best combined outcome is if both stay silent. However, because they can't communicate, they are unsure of what the other will do, leading to a dilemma.
Indicators of a Prisoner's Dilemma include:
When confronted with a Prisoner's Dilemma:
Try to identify a personal or professional situation where you encountered the Prisoner's Dilemma. Reflect on how it was resolved, and apply the above steps to see if a different outcome could have been achieved.
The Prisoner's Dilemma teaches us that the best decision isn't always what's best for us personally, but rather what's best for the group. Understand this, and you're on your way to making decisions that foster collaboration and yielding optimal results.